Cctv news(Reporter Xu Hui) On November 2, Hebei Provincial Market Supervision Administration announced typical cases (the 77th batch) in the field of market supervision through the official account "Hebei Market Supervision", and five typical cases were announced, namely:
01. Zaoqiang Chengmei Kitchen Equipment Factory produced and sold unqualified household gas cookers.
According to the clues handed over by other departments, law enforcement officers of Zaoqiang County Market Supervision Administration inspected Chengmei Kitchen Equipment Factory in Zaoqiang County. After investigation, the household gas cookers such as Jinhua Z liquefied gas, Jinhua Z natural gas, and T22 copper embedded in the glass of natural gas thermocouple were tested, and the flameout protection device did not meet the standard of Household Gas Cookers (GB 16410-2020), which violated the provisions of Article 13 of People’s Republic of China (PRC) Product Quality Law. According to Article 49 of the Product Quality Law of People’s Republic of China (PRC), Zaoqiang County Market Supervision Administration confiscated the articles involved and illegal income and imposed a fine, with a total of 300,300 yuan.
02. Handan Houde Property Service Co., Ltd. set up a branch to engage in business activities without registration and charged other fees in the electricity bill.
According to the clues handed over by other departments, law enforcement officers of Yongnian District Market Supervision Administration of Handan City filed an investigation on Handan Houde Property Service Co., Ltd. according to law. After investigation, it was found that the company set up a branch without registration to engage in business activities and charged other fees in the electricity bill, which violated the provisions of Article 14, paragraph 1, of the Company Law of People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Article 44, paragraph 1, of the Electricity Law of People’s Republic of China (PRC). According to Article 210 of the Company Law of People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Article 66 of the Electricity Law of People’s Republic of China (PRC), the Yongnian District Market Supervision Administration of Handan ordered the parties to correct their illegal acts, returned the illegally collected fees, warned the parties and imposed a fine of 120,000 yuan.
03. The case of infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark by Yingke Fast Food Restaurant in Hengshui High-tech Zone.
According to the reports from the masses, the law enforcement officers of the High-tech Zone Branch of Hengshui Municipal Market Supervision Administration inspected the welcoming fast food restaurants in the High-tech Zone according to law. After investigation, it was found that the store marked "Hundred Mu of Forest" on signs and walls without the permission of the trademark registrant, which violated the exclusive right to use the registered trademark of "Hundred Mu of Forest" and the provisions of Item (1) of Paragraph 1 of Article 57 of the Trademark Law of People’s Republic of China (PRC). According to the second paragraph of Article 60 of the Trademark Law of People’s Republic of China (PRC), the High-tech Zone Branch of Hengshui Municipal Market Supervision Administration ordered the parties to immediately stop the infringement and imposed a fine of 15,000 yuan.
04. Xingtai Branch of Beijing Huatu Hongyang Education and Cultural Development Co., Ltd. issued an illegal advertising case.
Xingtai Branch of Beijing Huatu Hongyang Education and Cultural Development Co., Ltd. issued an advertisement for education and training, which contained such contents as "30 points before the exam and 4 days of crash", which violated the first item of the first paragraph of Article 24 of the Advertising Law of People’s Republic of China (PRC). According to Item 6, Paragraph 1, Article 58 of the Advertising Law of People’s Republic of China (PRC), the Xiangdu District Market Supervision and Administration Bureau of Xingtai City ordered it to stop publishing the illegal advertisement according to law, to eliminate the influence and impose a fine of 16,000 yuan.
05, Shenzhou Yishikang Vision Center issued an illegal advertising case.
The Yishikang Vision Center in Shenzhou released an advertisement for glasses, which contained false contents such as "a pair of glasses that are not long, improve concentration, enhance memory, stop myopia and ensure the effect", which violated the provisions of Article 28 of the Advertising Law of People’s Republic of China (PRC). According to the first paragraph of Article 55 of the Advertising Law of People’s Republic of China (PRC), Shenzhou Municipal Market Supervision Administration ordered it to stop publishing the illegal advertisement, eliminate the influence and impose a fine of 16,000 yuan.
关于作者